Petar Petrov :: home blog

Al Gore is sued by 30,000 scientists for fraud! 900 of them PhD! Leaded by John Coleman.

I am personally insulted by Gore , as a green, ecologist minded person myself!

THE INCONVENIENT TRUTH is that it is a LIE.

The table below is taken directly from wikipedia entry for Green_house_gas with increases since the year 1750, considered the beginning of the industrial age. It clearly shows that CO2 has increased by 37%, compared to Methane CH4 by 250%. Why not freak about Methane too? Well, because it does not support the ultimate conclusion that it is man caused. Since, we all know cars don’t emit Methane, cows DO Note: ppm = parts per million, ppb = parts per billion

One thing most of the CO2 theory supporters will probably bash in your face is the property “Radiating Force component”. A.k.a. “Net irradiance” is the difference between the incoming radiation energy and the outgoing radiation energy in a given climate system, measured in Watts per square meter. Indeed this will imply that CO2 traps more heat than the rest of the green gases. However, one important remark to make is the connection between “net irradiance” and solar activity. It does change under more heat from the sun. In effect, way more significant than the amount of the green-gas itself, measured parts per cubic space.

See table below, changes in radiative forcing between 1750 and 2005 as estimated by the IPCC:

So the debate is not OVER! In fact there was never one. How exactly a small, closed panel of scientist have the ruling of such an issue as Global climate change. IPCC is nothing but a crocked mafia panel. Put there not by all but by these very few ones I will refer to as ‘White Mafia’, *.GOV An open to the people panel of independent scientists must simply put the facts down, that global climate change is most certainly not a man made problem. Then the question is what you do with non-man caused phenomenon. I think the discussion of whether to DO or NOT DO is going to be a feverish one.

Don’t get me wrong. I certainly do not advocate or promote fossil fuel burning and reliance upon such. But shell we all accept freely the most redicilous war of all? the WAR on the CLIMATE? and…

At What expense? To the fundamental black mailing of developed and growing countries to downsize their industries?

To implement such a phoney protocols as Kyoto Protocol?

See the 10min only version of Al Gore and Global Warming CRISIS!

So!, if it is not the CO2 what’s causing the warming? Well it is the very same thing that did in the past, and the winner is: “THE SUN”. Such a surprise to some

Read Nature News Article. This is a good independent source, unfortunately a paid one

I liked this reply:

“Thanks for this news story and for informing the public of an uncertainty in some of the temperature measurements. There has never been any doubt “about the reality of climate change.” However, Al Gore, NOAA, NASA and the ICPP were blatantly wrong to ignore scientific evidence that Earth’s climate follows cyclic changes in solar activity [1-8] rather than CO2 from the burning of hydrocarbon fuels. REFERENCES: [1] P. D. Jose: 1965, “Sun’s motion and sunspots”, Astronomy Journal 70, 193-200; [2] R. W. Fairbridge and J. H. Shirley: 1987, “Prolonged minima and the 179 year cycle of the solar inertial motion,” Solar Physics 110 191-220; [3] Theodor Landscheidt: 1999, “Extrema in sunspot cycle linked to Sun’s motion, “Solar Physics 189, 413-424; http://bourabai.narod.ru/landscheidt/extrema.htm [4] O. K. Manuel, B. W. Ninham and S. E. Friberg: 2003, “Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate,” J. Fusion Energy 21, 193-198; [5] J. Shirley: 2006, “Axial rotation, orbital revolution, and solar spin-orbit coupling,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 368, 280-282; [6] W. J. R. Alexander, F. Bailey, D. B. Bredenkamp, A. vander Merwe and N. Willemse: 2007, “Linkages between solar activity, climate predictability and water resource development,” J. South African Institut. Civil Eng. 49, 32-44. http://www.lavoisier.com.au/papers/Conf2007/Alexander-etal-2007.pdf [7] O. Manuel and H. Ratcliffe: 2008, “Fingerprints of a local supernova,” in Supernova Research [Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, NY, USA] in press. “

~ by spesho on December 3, 2008.